[PATCH 1/4] block: add mq_ops->queue_rqs hook
Hannes Reinecke
hare at suse.de
Sat Dec 4 02:43:50 PST 2021
On 12/3/21 10:45 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> If we have a list of requests in our plug list, send it to the driver in
> one go, if possible. The driver must set mq_ops->queue_rqs() to support
> this, if not the usual one-by-one path is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/blk-mq.h | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 22ec21aa0c22..9ac9174a2ba4 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2513,6 +2513,7 @@ void blk_mq_flush_plug_list(struct blk_plug *plug, bool from_schedule)
> {
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *this_hctx;
> struct blk_mq_ctx *this_ctx;
> + struct request *rq;
> unsigned int depth;
> LIST_HEAD(list);
>
> @@ -2521,7 +2522,26 @@ void blk_mq_flush_plug_list(struct blk_plug *plug, bool from_schedule)
> plug->rq_count = 0;
>
> if (!plug->multiple_queues && !plug->has_elevator && !from_schedule) {
> - blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(plug->mq_list->q,
> + struct request_queue *q;
> +
> + rq = plug->mq_list;
> + q = rq->q;
> +
> + /*
> + * Peek first request and see if we have a ->queue_rqs() hook.
> + * If we do, we can dispatch the whole plug list in one go. We
> + * already know at this point that all requests belong to the
> + * same queue, caller must ensure that's the case.
> + */
> + if (q->mq_ops->queue_rqs &&
> + !(rq->mq_hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED)) {
What is the dependency on shared tags here?
From what I've seen it's just about submitting requests; the only
difference to shared tags is the way the tags are allocated.
Care to explain?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare at suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list