nvme: enable char device per namespace
Javier González
javier at javigon.com
Wed Dec 9 04:16:36 EST 2020
On 08.12.2020 15:21, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>A bunch of nitpicks (mostly naming as usual, sorry..):
No worries. Thanks for taking the time.
>
>> +static int __nvme_ns_ioctl(struct gendisk *disk, unsigned int cmd,
>> + unsigned long arg)
>> {
>
>What about nvme_disk_ioctl instead as that is what it operates on?
Sure.
>
>> +static int nvme_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>> + unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>> +{
>> + return __nvme_ns_ioctl(bdev->bd_disk, cmd, arg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static long nvme_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>> + unsigned long arg)
>> +{
>> + return __nvme_ns_ioctl((struct gendisk *)file->private_data, cmd, arg);
>> +}
>
>No need for the cast.
>
>Also can we keep all the char device methods together close to the
>struct file_operations declaration? I just prefer to keep the code
>a little grouped.
Perfect.
>
>> -static int nvme_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
>> +static int __nvme_open(struct nvme_ns *ns)
>> {
>> - struct nvme_ns *ns = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
>> -
>> #ifdef CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH
>> /* should never be called due to GENHD_FL_HIDDEN */
>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ns->head->disk))
>> @@ -1846,12 +1859,24 @@ static int nvme_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
>> return -ENXIO;
>> }
>>
>> +static void __nvme_release(struct nvme_ns *ns)
>> +{
>> + module_put(ns->ctrl->ops->module);
>> + nvme_put_ns(ns);
>> +}
>
>nvme_ns_open and nvme_ns_release?
ok.
>
>> +
>> +static int nvme_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
>> +{
>> + struct nvme_ns *ns = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
>> +
>> + return __nvme_open(ns);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void nvme_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
>> {
>> struct nvme_ns *ns = disk->private_data;
>>
>> - module_put(ns->ctrl->ops->module);
>> - nvme_put_ns(ns);
>> + __nvme_release(ns);
>
>No need for the local ns variable in both cases.
ok.
>
>> +static int nvme_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>> +{
>> + struct nvme_ns *ns = container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct nvme_ns, cdev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = __nvme_open(ns);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + file->private_data = ns->disk;
>> +
>> + return ret;
>
>Do we need the ->private_data assignment at all? I think the ioctl
>handler could just grab it directly from i_cdev.
Mmmm. Good point. I'll try that.
>
>> + sprintf(cdisk_name, "nvme%dn%dc", ctrl->instance, ns->head->instance);
>
>And the most important naming decision is this. I have two issues with
>naming still:
>
> - we aready use the c for controller in the hidden disk naming. Although
> that is in a different position, but I think this not super intuitive.
> - this is missing multipath support entirely, so once we want to add
> multipath support we'll run into issues. So maybe use something
> based off the hidden node naming? E.g.:
>
> sprintf(disk_name, "nvme-generic-%dc%dn%d", ctrl->subsys->instance,
> ctrl->instance, ns->head->instance);
Perfect. Sounds like a good compromise to still keep the original hidden
disk. Keith is happy too, so we have a plan.
>> + /* When the device does not support any of the features required by the
>> + * kernel (or viceversa), hide the block device. We can still rely on
>> + * the namespace char device for submitting IOCTLs
>> + */
>
>Normal kernel comment style is the opening
>
> /*
>
>on its own line.
OK.
>
>> if (nvme_update_ns_info(ns, id))
>> - goto out_put_disk;
>> + disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_HIDDEN;
>
>I don't think we can do this based on all the error returns. I think
>we'll have to move the flags manipulation into nvme_update_ns_info to
>also cover the revalidate case.
Ok.
I am working on the multipath part. I'll send a V3 with all these
comments and then a follow-up patch with multipath.
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list