[PATCH v2 4/7] nvme_fc: add dev_loss_tmo to controller
James Smart
jsmart2021 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 7 09:08:21 PDT 2017
On 10/5/2017 1:00 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Can you please add the dev_loss_tmo to the generic nvme_ctrl and build
> the infrastructure in common code?
>
> Then as a next step we can look into inferring it from the remote port
> for FC.
>
Hmm - this raise flags in my mind. I'm not sure how a dev_loss_tmo
applies to any other transport other than FC.
I am inclined to rework this a bit though as I think the mashing of the
dev_loss_tmo value into the controller's ctrl_loss_tmo has caused
confusion. The dev_loss_tmo should stay in the transport and be specific
to the remoteport. Mashing them also caused us to loose the initial
creation ctrl_loss_tmo value if there had been one set and the dev_loss
value dynamically changed. I'll rework it so that: dev_loss_tmo is an
FC internal timer that acts on the remoteport. Upon device loss, the
remote ports dev_loss timer will be started, and any controllers on the
remote port will have their associations torn down and their
ctrl_loss_tmo (aka max_reconnects and reconnect_delay) started. If a
controllers max_reconnects is hit it will be deleted. If the rport's
dev_loss_tmo is hit, it will delete any suspended controller.
-- james
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list