[PATCH v2 0/4] arbitrary sg lists support

[Max Gurtovoy]

On 5/1/2017 9:50 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 17:35 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>>
>>> I actually answered here:
>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg46412.html
>>
>> Did anything progress with the debug?
>>
>>>
>>> Sagi,
>>> As you mentioned the IO path is different in SRP and iSER so IMO we
>>> should start with SRP debugging. NVMf is similar to iSER (and not
>>> SRP)
>>> and that's why I think we can apply this patchset.
>>
>> My concern is that this might be broken due to the fact that we don't
>> know what triggers this.
>>
>>>
>>> If you want to wait till we debug SRP issue it's fine, but I can't
>>> repro
>>> it in my lab so it can take longer.
>>
>> I'd prefer not to take a non-mandatory feature that is not guaranteed
>> to work.
>
> Indeed.  I've left this series on hold (actually, I've removed it from
> patchworks).  When we get this straightened, then please resubmit.
>

Sure, no problem.

Max.