[PATCH 06/13] irq: add a helper spread an affinity mask for MSI/MSI-X vectors
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev at redhat.com
Fri Jul 1 00:25:27 PDT 2016
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 07:48:54PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:05:19PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > > + * and generate an output cpumask suitable for spreading MSI/MSI-X vectors
> > > + * so that they are distributed as good as possible around the CPUs. If
> > > + * more vectors than CPUs are available we'll map one to each CPU,
> >
> > Unless I do not misinterpret a loop from msix_setup_entries() (patch 08/13),
> > the above is incorrect:
>
> What part do you think is incorrect?
With your explanations below and no immediate intention to fix the
algorithm it is correct.
> > (*) I guess, in some topology configurations a total number of all
> > first siblings may be less than the number of vectors.
>
> Yes, in that case we'll assign imcompetely. I've already heard people
> complaining about that at LSF/MM, but no one volunteered patches.
> I only have devices with 1 or enough vectores to test, so I don't
> really dare to touch the algorithm. Either way the algorithm
> change should probably be a different patch than refactoring it and
> moving it around.
I see your approach now. Thanks!
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list