[PATCH 0/4] NVMe: Surprise removal fixes

Keith Busch keith.busch at intel.com
Thu Feb 4 07:52:22 PST 2016


On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:25:50AM +0000, Wenbo Wang wrote:
> Isn't the dd behavior correct? For non-direct dd, even if a surprise remove happened, it simply keeps dirtying the page cache and is not aware of any errors below.

Try it with a usb drive. It ends with ENOSPC error.



More information about the Linux-nvme mailing list