[PATCHv2 00/10] Second attempt at blk-mq + nvme hotplug fixes
Keith Busch
keith.busch at intel.com
Wed Jan 7 08:31:47 PST 2015
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 01/06/2015 07:57 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
>> Second try, this time tested against many more scenarios than before
>> with error injection and surprise hot-removal and intermittent resets.
>>
>> I'm adding a lot of stuff outside the driver, but I didn't find a
>> cleaner way to a lot of these things. This makes me a little nervous,
>> so please let me know if anything seems amiss here. I don't think any
>> of the blk-mq changes could possibly be harmful to anyone else since
>> nvme is the only driver that uses most of the additions.
>>
>> The only issue remaining I found is unfreezing queues might tigger the
>> percpu_ref_reinit WARN_ON_ONCE when the driver restarts a request_queue
>> with queued up IO's.
>>
>> This is against linux-block/for-next.
>
> Series looks sane to me, apart from the timeout change I replied to
> separately. Could you turn that into a request flag and respin the series on
> top of that?
Thanks a bunch, I'll respin the series with the no-timeout request flag,
correct irq spin locking I found in [8/10], and fix attribution in [4/10].
>> Jens,
>> I believe fourth one ("abort requeue list") is from you, but I didn't find
>> the patch.
>
> Yeah it is, sent to you on 12/23 as part of the "nvme-blkmq fixes" thread.
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list