[PATCH v4 3/5] dt-bindings: mtd: spi-nor: add OTP parameters

[Erez]

On Tue, 17 Sept 2024 at 19:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 17/09/2024 19:11, Erez wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Sept 2024 at 19:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 17/09/2024 12:42, Erez wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 17 Sept 2024 at 12:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 17/09/2024 11:49, Erez Geva wrote:
> >>>>> From: Erez Geva <ErezGeva2 at gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Some flash devices need OTP parameters in device tree.
> >>>>> As we can not deduce the parameters based on JEDEC ID or SFDP.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Erez Geva <ErezGeva2 at gmail.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  .../bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml           | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
> >>>>> index 6e3afb42926e..d502b7fab2ce 100644
> >>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
> >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
> >>>>> @@ -90,6 +90,43 @@ properties:
> >>>>>        the SRWD bit while writing the status register. WP# signal hard strapped to GND
> >>>>>        can be a valid use case.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +  opt_n_regions:
> >>>>
> >>>> No underscores, but hyphens.
> >>>
> >>> I'll fix this.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> +    type: u32
> >>>>
> >>>> It does not look like you tested the bindings, at least after quick
> >>>> look. Please run `make dt_binding_check` (see
> >>>
> >>> I run "make dt_binding_check" on kernel 6.6.
> >>
> >> Yeah, we are no on kernel 6.6. You can run it also on kernel v4.1 -
> >> still does not matter.
> >>
> >> Don't develop on ancient code because then you ask us to review same
> >> broken stuff we already fixed.
> >
> > I test with Beaglebone black for testing, it is difficult to run the
> > last vanille version.
> > I did backport the spi-nor driver.
> > As for "make dt_binding_check" on last kernel, it need to upgrade the tools,
> >  and I did not think it could change that much.
> >
>
> Well, it is possible to build kernel on small embedded board, but that's
> quite cumbersone, slow and inefficient, considering that it's just
> easier to cross compile. But anyway, binding check does not even need
> cross compilation.
>
> Sorry, the code is obviously wrong, there is no such thing as u32, so
> you did not test it. I provided link which explains how to test it. You
> must do it on latest mainline kernel. Just like you must develop and
> generate patches on latest mainline kernel, because this is where we
> apply the patches. We do not apply them to v6.6.

The patches are based on the lastest  mainline kernel.
I do not understand why you think otherwise.
I will run the "make dt_binding_check" on the mainline kernel.

Thanks for your feedback.
Erez

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>