[RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready
geert at linux-m68k.org
Sat May 31 09:20:43 PDT 2014
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> On Saturday 31 May 2014 16:51:15 Richard Cochran wrote:
>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:01:24PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > I picked this because it is a fairly isolated problem, as the
>> > inode time stamps are rarely assigned to any other time values.
>> > As a byproduct of this work, I documented for each of the file
>> > systems we support how long the on-disk format can work.
>> Why are some of the time stamp expiration dates marked as "never"?
> It's an approximation:
> with 64-bit timestamps, you can represent close to 300 billion
> years, which is way past the time that our planet can sustain
> life of any form.
FWIW, the 48-bit second limit of befs marked never happens sooner
than the 32-bit day limit of affs marked as Y11760870.
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
More information about the linux-mtd