[PATCH v4] UBI: block: Continue creating ubiblocks after an initialization error

[Ezequiel Garcia]

On 12/19/2014 04:16 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Daniel Ehrenberg <dehrenberg at google.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Ezequiel Garcia
>> <ezequiel at vanguardiasur.com.ar> wrote:
>>> I think you should re-send on top of linux-next. Commit
>>> 326087033108e7806e24974f2c8271f95cddaf3a has changed the way
>>> user messages are printed.
>>>
>>> Other than that, the patch looks good:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel at vanguardiasur.com.ar>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When you say linux-next, do you mean Linus's linux-next?

This is what I meant:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git

> I had based
>> my patch on linux-mtd.git's master branch (based on what I saw at
>> http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/source.html#kernelversions) but
>> apparently that doesn't include the patch you mention, whereas Linus
>> does have it. Is Linus's linux-next where to find the most up-to-date
>> version of the MTD code, or is there another repository that includes
>> bleeding-edge stuff?
> 
> You want the most current UBI stuff. :-)
> git://git.infradead.org/linux-ubifs.git
> 

Exactly. MTD and UBI/UBIFS are different subsystems with different trees
and maintainers.

-- 
Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar