[PATCH v4 0/4] optimize and clean-up of OMAP NAND and ELM driver

[Brian Norris]

On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 08:54:34AM +0000, Pekon Gupta wrote:
> >From: Brian Norris [mailto:computersforpeace at gmail.com]
> >
> >I'm sorry to delay this long, but this patch series is still rather
> >impenetrable for a third-party reader, and so I really can't give my sign-off.
> >
> >For one, you don't give very good patch titles; 3 of the 4 have "optimize" in
> >the title, when in fact that "optimize" does not mean anything about
> >optimization, but rather, "unification", "consolidation", "cleanup", or
> >something else entirely, depending on which part of the patch you're talking
> >about... which brings me to the next point:
> >
> I think with all sorts of patches, I feel I have completely re-written the
> omap nand driver. After this series and one more, I think there is hardly
> any line in omap2.c which is not touched. So, I'm run-out of good titles :-)

I understand there is a lot of rewriting. The problem here is just that
you're doing too many things in a single patch.

> >Patches 1 and 4 are doing much more than one thing. Your commit messages
> >-- rather than describing succintly a single change being made -- are a
> >description of a list of things that you did, some of which are quite
> >independent.
> >
> Ok I'll first try to break each patch in smaller chunks..
> But this would bloat the number of patches, so I would break this series
> into multiple series, hope that's fine ?
>  - Patch series for chip->ecc.correct()
>  - Patch series for chip->ecc.calculate()
>  - Patch series for chip->ecc.hwctl()
>  - Patch series for ELM 

Hmm, if there are as many dependencies between patches as I expect, then
I think it's best to be a single series still. Too many patches is not
really a problem in itself, as long as the patches are reviewable
chunks.

> >If you need clarification on how you can best rework/resubmit this work,
> >please ask. I don't want this series to drag on to version 12+, so let's
> >focus on how to get this right now.
> >
> Agreed, thanks for feedback.
> I'll resubmit these patches breaking them into independent versions.
> Hopefully then it would be easy to review.

Ok, thanks for the effort.

Brian