[PATCH v2 01/14] mtd: nand: pxa3xx: Introduce 'marvell,armada370-nand' compatible string

[Ezequiel Garcia]

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:28:57AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 09:31:06AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > This driver supports NFCv1 (as found in PXA SoC) and NFCv2 (as found in
> > Armada 370/XP SoC). As both controller has a few differences, a way of
> > distinguishing between the two is needed.
> > 
> > This commit introduces a new compatible string 'marvell,armada370-nand'
> > and assigns a compatible data of type enum pxa3xx_nand_variant to allow
> > such distinction.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> > index 501e380..2582e1f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> > @@ -123,6 +123,11 @@ enum {
> >  	STATE_READY,
> >  };
> >  
> > +enum pxa3xx_nand_variant {
> > +	PXA3XX_NAND_VARIANT_PXA,
> > +	PXA3XX_NAND_VARIANT_ARMADA370,
> > +};
> > +
> >  struct pxa3xx_nand_host {
> >  	struct nand_chip	chip;
> >  	struct pxa3xx_nand_cmdset *cmdset;
> > @@ -171,6 +176,12 @@ struct pxa3xx_nand_info {
> >  	struct pxa3xx_nand_host *host[NUM_CHIP_SELECT];
> >  	unsigned int		state;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * This driver supports NFCv1 (as found in PXA SoC)
> > +	 * and NFCv2 (as found in Armada 370/XP SoC).
> > +	 */
> > +	enum pxa3xx_nand_variant variant;
> > +
> >  	int			cs;
> >  	int			use_ecc;	/* use HW ECC ? */
> >  	int			use_dma;	/* use DMA ? */
> > @@ -1192,7 +1203,14 @@ static int pxa3xx_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> >  static struct of_device_id pxa3xx_nand_dt_ids[] = {
> > -	{ .compatible = "marvell,pxa3xx-nand" },
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "marvell,pxa3xx-nand",
> > +		.data       = (void *) PXA3XX_NAND_VARIANT_PXA,
> 
> It's a little more common to avoid a space between the cast and the
> rvalue. But that's a nitpick that can go either way (it's not in
> CodingStyle, for one).
> 

Sure.

> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "marvell,armada370-nand",
> > +		.data       = (void *) PXA3XX_NAND_VARIANT_ARMADA370,
> > +	},
> >  	{}
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pxa3xx_nand_dt_ids);
> > @@ -1221,11 +1239,28 @@ static int pxa3xx_nand_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > +
> > +static enum pxa3xx_nand_variant
> > +pxa3xx_nand_get_variant(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> > +			of_match_device(pxa3xx_nand_dt_ids, &pdev->dev);
> > +	if (!of_id)
> > +		return PXA3XX_NAND_VARIANT_PXA;
> > +	return (enum pxa3xx_nand_variant) of_id->data;
> > +}
> >  #else
> >  static inline int pxa3xx_nand_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> 
> It looks like before this patch, you don't actually need the whole
> #ifdef/#else CONFIG_OF block. All the of_* helpers have default inline
> implementations that allow things to compile even without CONFIG_OF. So
> without CONFIG_OF, of_match_device() will just return NULL and the
> compiler can easiliy figure out that pxa3xx_nand_probe_dt() always
> should return 0.
> 
> IOW, you only need a single pxa3xx_nand_probe_dt() implementation.
> 
> And directly related to this patch: you don't need two
> pxa3xx_nand_get_variant() implementations either. Again,
> of_match_device() returns NULL in the !defined(CONFIG_OF) case.
> 
> > +
> > +static enum pxa3xx_nand_variant
> > +pxa3xx_nand_get_variant(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	/* Default lefacy (non-DT) variant */
> 
> s/lefacy/legacy/
> 
> > +	return PXA3XX_NAND_VARIANT_PXA;
> > +}
> 
> Given the above comments, you won't need this version of
> pxa3xx_nand_get_variant().
> 
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  static int pxa3xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > @@ -1252,6 +1287,7 @@ static int pxa3xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	info->variant = pxa3xx_nand_get_variant(pdev);
> >  	probe_success = 0;
> >  	for (cs = 0; cs < pdata->num_cs; cs++) {
> >  		info->cs = cs;
> 
> I would recommend rewriting this patch to remove the #ifdef CONFIG_OF.
> 

Good to hear this! It was my intention in the first place, but refrained
from doing so for I thought someone might complain about the CONFIG_OF removal.

So if I remember correct, I'd say this means a patch split (right?):
one patch to remove CONFIG_OF, one patch to introduce the SoC variant.

Thanks for reviewing!
-- 
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com