Can PYSMAP_COMPAT go?

[Wolfram Sang]

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:20:56AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:04 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Okay, so unless i386 gets device-tree support ;), how about at least
> > this?
> 
> I'd love to see i386 get device-tree support. OLPC could benefit from it
> immediately, and we could start using it on the embedded toys which are
> coming out now.

True. It was the "unless" I was pointing for. I'd think it will take a long
while...

> I really don't think 0x4000000 is a 'sensible' default. Zero was better

Okay. I just wanted to remove the inconsistency (all these options could be 0
then). But it's probably now worth the fuss.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20100420/8f808290/attachment.sig>