[PATCH] nand/s3c2410: s3c2410_nand_setrate(): use correct macros for 2412/2440

David Woodhouse dwmw2 at infradead.org
Mon Jun 8 03:51:00 EDT 2009

On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 23:41 -0700, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> "Re in subject but no in-reply-to". dwmw2 was going to fix this
> few years ago :-)

Other way round, surely. It's the thread-hijack check, which checks for
messages with In-Reply-To: or References: headers indicating that
they're a reply to an existing thread, but without 'Re:' or 'Aw:' in the
Subject: header.

In the years since I implemented that basic netiquette check, it's
become acceptable to do exactly that for patch sequences. I thought I'd
fixed it to accept 'PATCH' as well as 'Re:' and 'Aw:', but on looking
closer I see I screwed it up -- it was trying to do a case-insensitive
compare by turning the subject header into lower case before the 
comparison.... and then comparing against 'PATCH' in upper case... :)

Fixed now:

David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse at intel.com                              Intel Corporation

More information about the linux-mtd mailing list