[RFC/PATCH] flash_eraseall: extra care if NOR flash is not BIT_WRITEABLE

Artem Bityutskiy dedekind at infradead.org
Mon Apr 6 05:32:43 EDT 2009


On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 12:29 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 22:07 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > >I can apply them if there are not complaints. But how you have
> > >tested them? I would not want to break 'flash_eraseall' once again :-)
> > understand. Nope, I do not have such flash. I got a bug report against
> > clean marker on a data flash and that is why I started looking into
> > this.
> 
> Well, I meant I did not find dependencies in flash_eraseall.
> 
> I think JFFS2 should be just fixed and should always use
> 12 bytes.

But well, I do not use JFFS2 and do not have time to delve into
that :-(

The only thing I can help you with is to try to review your userspace
changes and push them if they are fine :-)

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)




More information about the linux-mtd mailing list