[RFC][PATCH][JFFS2] JFFS2 support for NOP 1

[Kyungmin Park]

> On Tue, 27 November 2007 20:48:33 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> > >
> > > NAK.  This does not describe the limitations of your chip, but a random
> > > name.  In fact, the limitations appear to be identical to
> > > (MTD_NORFLASH & !MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE).
> > >
> > > Maybe something like ALLOW_SEPERATE_OOB_WRITE with reversed logic?
> > >
> >
> > However MTD_NORFLASH doesn't have the write buffer. It means it can be
> > write one more.
>
> Some NOR flashes _do_ require write buffers.  The ones I know must be
> written in aligned multiples of 8, 16 or 1024 bytes, respectively.  In
> spite of being NOR, that sounds quite similar to what you try to achieve
> for NAND.
>

Hi Jörn,

You probably mean the "Intel Sibley NOR".
Yes, the concept is same. It want to use write buffer but oob in NAND.
I hope to modify the code with small modification to work the MLC NAND.
As written in previous mail, we only update the mtd->flags and sub
page value at driver level.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park