smcnutt at artesyncp.com said: > I thought I used 131072. But based on the dump, I must have > fat-fingered 131071 :-(. I made a new image with -e 131072 and it > looks good. Er, yes, that would confuse it quite a lot. Perhaps we ought to make mkfs.jffs2 reject values which aren't a power of two? -- dwmw2