dhinds at zen.stanford.edu
Wed May 12 13:15:56 EDT 1999
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 04:32:08PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > The patent claims are broad enough that I don't see any straighforward
> > way of writing a free non-FTL translation layer. But I'm not a patent
> > lawyer, and don't really know what can and can't be gotten away with.
> alex at signum.se said:
> > Note that there *might* be patent problems using this code in the US.
> Is this _just_ a US problem, or are the patents applicable world-wide?
I don't know. I could ask M-Systems, I guess.
> Could we get away with inserting a check so that the FTL code is
> only allowed to
> be used with PCMCIA devices, (which can conveniently be disabled with a
> single-line patch)
I'm not super interested in opening myself up for a potential lawsuit,
so I'm not sure if this would be a good approach.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at imladris.demon.co.uk
More information about the linux-mtd