[PATCH] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts: fix mt7987 thermal crash

Frank Wunderlich linux at fw-web.de
Thu Mar 12 00:39:26 PDT 2026


Am 11. März 2026 10:35:19 MEZ schrieb Laura Nao <laura.nao at collabora.com>:
>Hi!
>
>On 3/9/26 07:44, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w at public-files.de>
>>
>> On mt7987 we see a crash due to missing ops entry.
>>
>> [    1.518540] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1]  SMP
>> ...
>> [    1.564481] pc : lvts_get_temp+0x84/0xc4
>> [    1.564492] lr : lvts_get_temp+0x60/0xc4
>> ...
>> [    1.620900] Call trace:
>> [    1.631753]  lvts_get_temp+0x84/0xc4 (P)
>> [    1.645471]  __thermal_zone_get_temp+0x24/0x11c
>> [    1.656502]  __thermal_zone_device_update+0x9c/0x52c
>>
>> Add the new ops member added in 7.0-rc1 for mt7987 too.
>>
>> Fixes: a4c40559499f ("thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts: Add platform ops to support alternative conversion logic")
>
>I think the Fixes tag should reference 
>"thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts_thermal: Add mt7987 support", as the 
>commit introducing the ops also updated all existing data structs (seems 
>like mt7987 support landed right after).

Ok, i will change this. Have not looked on order how commits
are applied. Both commits were new in 7.0.

>> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w at public-files.de>
>> ---
>>  drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
>> index a9617d5e0077..5671531d4c23 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
>> @@ -2026,6 +2026,7 @@ static const struct lvts_data mt7987_lvts_ap_data = {
>>  	.temp_offset	= LVTS_COEFF_B_MT7987,
>>  	.gt_calib_bit_offset = 32,
>>  	.def_calibration = 19380,
>
>You'll probably need to define num_cal_offsets too, since the number of 
>calibration bytes was also made configurable (not sure if this is 
>already addressed by a separate patch).

Thanks for pointing to this.
Should i change in same patch or in separate one?

>> +	.ops = &lvts_platform_ops_mt7988,
>>  };
>>  
>>  static const struct lvts_data mt7988_lvts_ap_data = {
>
>Best,
>
>Laura



regards Frank



More information about the Linux-mediatek mailing list