[PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: net: wireless: mt76: clarify backoff limit format

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 4:41 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/02/2026 09:33, Ryder Lee wrote:
> >>>> Why this cannot be a schema?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Well, actually, it's already a schema. This is just an expanded
> >>
> >> Where exactly?
> >>
> >
> > How 1T1ss is used across different generations is what my example above
> > was talking about.
>
> Where exactly it is already a schema? Please point me line encoding this.

I think what Krzysztof is asking is why can't you have different compatible
strings for each generation (connac, connac2, connac3), and then have
conditionals in this document to describe in proper DT schema, not text,
the length requirements of each property for each generation.


ChenYu

> >
> >> But if it is, then this patch is redundant. Don't repeat constraints
> >> in
> >> free form text.
> >>
> >
> > Alright then, let’s drop this change. Felix, please ignore this one.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>