[PATCH v2 08/12] drm/bridge: parade-ps8640: select DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE

[Luca Ceresoli]

On Mon Aug 31, 2026 at 4:58 PM CEST, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 2:01 AM Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli at bootlin.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu Aug 27, 2026 at 6:23 PM CEST, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 3:11 AM Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli at bootlin.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This driver uses the drm_panel_bridge API and not the drm_panel API so it
>> >> should select DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE and not DRM_PANEL.
>> >
>> > Which exact "drm_panel_bridge" API does it use? I don't see any...
>>
>> It calls devm_drm_of_get_bridge() [0], which is in bridge/panel.c [1],
>> which is enabled by CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE [2].
>>
>> [0] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.2.2/source/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c#L636
>> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.2.2/source/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c#L483-L515
>> [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.2.2/source/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile#L159
>
> Ah, indeed! I missed that since it didn't have "panel" in the name.
> FWIW, then I think for this patch:
>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
>
> ...but, ironically, that means that for the other patch I looked at
> (ti-sn65dsi86.c) we're missing the "select DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE" since it
> uses the same API call, doesn't it?

Ouch, indeed! Thanks for noticing.

I will send v3 with that fixed, can I keep your R-by if there's just that
change to the sn65dsi86 patch?

I am also going to double check all patches for this mistake.

Luca

--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com