[PATCH v10 18/21] drm/mediatek: Add mt8195 Embedded DisplayPort driver

[Rex-BC Chen]

On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 14:44 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Rex:
> 
> On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 12:47 +0200, Guillaume Ranquet wrote:
> > From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp at baylibre.com>
> > 
> > This patch adds a DisplayPort driver for the Mediatek mt8195 SoC.
> > 
> > It supports the mt8195, the embedded DisplayPort units. It offers
> > DisplayPort 1.4 with up to 4 lanes.
> > 
> > The driver creates a child device for the phy. The child device
> > will
> > never exist without the parent being active. As they are sharing a
> > register range, the parent passes a regmap pointer to the child so
> > that
> > both can work with the same register range. The phy driver sets
> > device
> > data that is read by the parent to get the phy device that can be
> > used
> > to control the phy properties.
> > 
> > This driver is based on an initial version by
> > Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin at mediatek.com>.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp at baylibre.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet at baylibre.com>
> > ---
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > +
> > +static int mtk_dp_train_handler(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
> > +{
> > +	bool training_done = false;
> > +	short max_retry = 50;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	do {
> > +		switch (mtk_dp->train_state) {
> > +		case MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_STARTUP:
> 
> mtk_dp->train_state is initialized as MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_STARTUP even
> though HPD ISR does not exist. Does this mean HPD ISR is redundant?
> If
> HPD ISR is not redundant, create a new state MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_NONE
> for init state.
> 

Hello CK,

I think we don't need MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_NONE.
Because it's "DP_TRAIN_STATE" not "DP_STATE", I think it's ok if we
start this state machine with "MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_STARTUP".

> > +			mtk_dp_state_handler(mtk_dp);
> > +			mtk_dp->train_state =
> > MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_CHECKCAP;
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		case MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_CHECKCAP:
> > +			if (mtk_dp_parse_capabilities(mtk_dp)) {
> > +				mtk_dp->train_info.check_cap_count = 0;
> > +				mtk_dp->train_state =
> > MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_CHECKEDID;
> > +			} else {
> > +				mtk_dp->train_info.check_cap_count++;
> > +
> > +				if (mtk_dp->train_info.check_cap_count
> > > 
> > 
> > +				    MTK_DP_CHECK_SINK_CAP_TIMEOUT_COUNT
> > ) {
> > +					mtk_dp-
> > > train_info.check_cap_count = 0;
> > 
> > +					mtk_dp->train_state =
> > MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_DPIDLE;
> > +					ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +				}
> > +			}
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		case MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_CHECKEDID:
> > +			mtk_dp->train_state =
> > MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_TRAINING_PRE;
> 
> MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_CHECKEDID is a redundant state, drop it.
> 
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		case MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_TRAINING_PRE:
> > +			mtk_dp_state_handler(mtk_dp);
> > +			mtk_dp->train_state =
> > MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_TRAINING;
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		case MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_TRAINING:
> > +			ret = mtk_dp_train_start(mtk_dp);
> > +			if (ret == 0) {
> > +				mtk_dp_video_mute(mtk_dp, true);
> > +				mtk_dp->train_state =
> > MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_NORMAL;
> > +				mtk_dp_fec_enable(mtk_dp, mtk_dp-
> > > has_fec);
> > 
> > +			} else if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
> > +				mtk_dp->train_state =
> > MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_DPIDLE;
> > +			}
> > +			break;
> > +		case MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_NORMAL:
> > +			mtk_dp_state_handler(mtk_dp);
> > +			training_done = true;
> > +			break;
> > +		case MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_DPIDLE:
> 
> When would this case happen?
> 
> Regards,
> CK

Yes, if it's disconnected if we are still training for dp.
or failed to training min spec RBR.

BRs,
Rex
> 
> > +			break;
> > +		default:
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> > +				continue;
> > +			/*
> > +			 * If we get any other error number, it doesn't
> > +			 * make any sense to keep iterating.
> > +			 */
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	} while (!training_done || --max_retry);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> 
>