[v2,4/4] dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186

[xinlei.lee]

On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 15:19 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 05:32:51PM +0800, xinlei.lee at mediatek.com
> wrote:
> > From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee at mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
> > 
> > Add dt-binding documentation of pwm for MediaTek MT8186 SoC.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee <
> > xinlei.lee at mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-
> > disp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-
> > disp.yaml
> > index 768ab04d3764..1f45b1b8c3d4 100755
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties:
> >        - mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm
> >        - mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm
> >        - mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm
> > +      - mediatek,mt8186-disp-pwm
> >        - mediatek,mt8192-disp-pwm
> >        - mediatek,mt8195-disp-pwm
> 
> It seems unlikely that every SoC has a different version of h/w for 
> something as simple as a PWM. There's not an appropriate fallback?
> The 
> first version from an SoC that has all the features and would work
> with 
> existing driver unchanged?
> 
> Rob

Hi Rob:

Thanks for your suggestion,I agree with your point of view.
If I want to show that different socs are using this disp_pwm, can I
use oneOf with items to achieve this, and reuse the compatiable that is
currently included in the pwm_mtk_disp.c file.
E.g:
- items:
       - enum:
           -mediatek,mt8186-disp-pwm
       - enum:
           -mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm
What's your suggestion for this program?

Best Regards!
xinlei