[PATCH v2 1/2] platform: make platform_get_irq_optional() optional

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello Geert,

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:01:14AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Also IMHO, the dummy value handling is a red herring.  Contrary to
> optional clocks and resets, a missing optional interrupt does not
> always mean there is nothing to do: in case of polling, something
> else must definitely be done. 

Note this is exactly why I don't like this change. I'd even go so far
and claim that "a missing optional interrupt hardly ever means there is
nothing to do".

> So even if request_irq() would accept a dummy interrupt zero and just
> do nothing, it would give the false impression that that is all there
> is to do, while an actual check for zero with polling code handling
> may still need to be present, thus leading to more not less bugs.

Yes, a dummy irq value will just not be possible.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/attachments/20220214/187b3253/attachment-0001.sig>