[PATCH v2 01/22] KVM: arm64: Prefault host stage-2 entries on block split
Mostafa Saleh
smostafa at google.com
Thu Sep 24 10:38:49 PDT 2026
On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 02:50:32PM +0100, 'Vincent Donnefort' via kernel-team wrote:
> From: Keir Fraser <keirf at google.com>
>
> For the host stage-2 that is idmap, we can avoid lazy-mapping on block
> splitting by propagating existing valid mappings to neighbouring entries
> of the new table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keirf at google.com>
> Co-developed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret at google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret at google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort at google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index b74dd5ce1efd..34f78a58cded 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -1030,10 +1030,39 @@ static int stage2_map_walk_table_pre(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void stage2_map_prefault_idmap(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx, kvm_pte_t *ptep)
> +{
> + kvm_pte_t block_pte = ctx->old;
> + u64 pa;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!kvm_pte_valid(block_pte))
> + return;
> +
> + pa = ALIGN_DOWN(ctx->addr, kvm_granule_size(ctx->level));
> + for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; ++i, ++ptep, pa += kvm_granule_size(ctx->level + 1)) {
> + kvm_pte_t pte = kvm_init_valid_leaf_pte(pa, block_pte, ctx->level + 1);
> +
> + /*
> + * Skip ptes in the range being modified by the caller if we're
> + * installing last level entries. Otherwise, we need to
> + * temporarily put in a valid mapping to make sure the
> + * prefaulting logic is triggered on the next
> + * stage2_map_walk_leaf(). This adds an unnecessary TLBI as
> + * we'll presumably re-break the freshly installed block, but
> + * that should happen very infrequently.
> + */
> + if ((ctx->level < (KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL - 1)) ||
> + (pa < ctx->addr) || (pa >= ctx->end))
> + *ptep = pte;
Do we need now to call get_page() on the table as we are installing a
new PTE?
Also, I think we need a WRITE_ONCE() for the PTE write.
Thanks,
Mostafa
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int stage2_map_walk_leaf(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
> struct stage2_map_data *data)
> {
> struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops = ctx->mm_ops;
> + struct kvm_pgtable *pgt = data->mmu->pgt;
> kvm_pte_t *childp, new;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1051,6 +1080,9 @@ static int stage2_map_walk_leaf(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
> if (!childp)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + if (pgt->flags & KVM_PGTABLE_S2_IDMAP)
> + stage2_map_prefault_idmap(ctx, childp);
> +
> if (!stage2_try_break_pte(ctx, data->mmu)) {
> mm_ops->put_page(childp);
> return -EAGAIN;
> --
> 2.55.0.1007.g17ff1f9808-goog
>
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe at android.com.
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list