[PATCH v14 09/11] clk: realtek: Add RTD1625-CRT clock controller driver

[Yu-Chun Lin [林祐君]]

Hi Jerome,

> > +
> > +static const char * const clk_gpu_parents[] = {"pll_gpu", "clk_sys"};
> > +static RTK_CLK_REGMAP_MUX(clk_gpu, clk_gpu_parents,
> CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT,
> > +                       0x28, 12, 0x1); static const char * const
> > +clk_ve_parents[] = {"pll_vo", "clk_sysh", "pll_ve1", "pll_ve2"};
> > +static RTK_CLK_REGMAP_MUX(clk_ve1, clk_ve_parents,
> CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT,
> > +                       0x4c, 0, 0x3); static
> > +RTK_CLK_REGMAP_MUX(clk_ve2, clk_ve_parents, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT |
> CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT,
> > +                       0x4c, 3, 0x3); static
> > +RTK_CLK_REGMAP_MUX(clk_ve4, clk_ve_parents, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT |
> CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT,
> > +                       0x4c, 6, 0x3); static
> > +RTK_CLK_REGMAP_GATE_NO_PARENT(clk_en_misc, CLK_IS_CRITICAL, 0x50,
> 0,
> > +1); clk_en_pcie0, 0, 0x50, 2,
> > +1); clk_en_gspi, 0, 0x50, 6, 1);
> > +clk_en_iso_misc, 0, 0x50, 10,
> > +1); clk_en_sds, 0, 0x50, 12, 1);
> > +clk_en_hdmi, 0, 0x50, 14, 1);
> 
> This is a lot of clock with no parents which is a bit suspicious especially for
> gates.
> What is really feeding those ?
> 

In v15, we will do our best to reduce the number of gate clocks without a parent.

However, after discussing with our colleague, we confirmed that for some of
these NO_PARENT gate clocks, their actual upstream clocks (like PLLs and
Muxes) are located in separate, independent hardware subsystems. The registers
controlling those upstream clocks are physically inaccessible from the Linux
CPU domain.

Best Regards,
Yu-Chun