[PATCH v19 03/20] KVM: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Sun, 20 Sep 2026 22:28:28 +0100
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com> wrote:

> Fix a potential build error (like below, when asm/kvm_emulate.h gets
> included after the kvm/arm_psci.h) by including the missing header file
> in kvm/arm_psci.h:
> 
> ./include/kvm/arm_psci.h: In function ‘kvm_psci_version’:
> ./include/kvm/arm_psci.h:29:13: error: implicit declaration of function
>    ‘vcpu_has_feature’; did you mean ‘cpu_have_feature’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    29 |         if (vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2)) {
> 	         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 			       |             cpu_have_feature
> 
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan at redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba at linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron at oss.qualcomm.com>

Seems like some of these precursor bits would ideally be picked up
asap - though that does confuse the LLM magic.

> ---
>  include/kvm/arm_psci.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_psci.h b/include/kvm/arm_psci.h
> index f86a006d67136..06c20612e9e7d 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_psci.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_psci.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>  #include <uapi/linux/psci.h>
>  
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> +
>  #define KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1	PSCI_VERSION(0, 1)
>  #define KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_2	PSCI_VERSION(0, 2)
>  #define KVM_ARM_PSCI_1_0	PSCI_VERSION(1, 0)