[PATCH v3 19/19] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: don't create a panel_bridge

Damon Ding damon.ding at rock-chips.com
Tue Sep 22 01:57:54 PDT 2026


Hi Heiko,

On 9/22/2026 4:22 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Luca,
> 
> Am Dienstag, 22. September 2026, 10:12:41 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Luca Ceresoli:
>> On Mon Sep 21, 2026 at 5:07 AM CEST, Damon Ding wrote:
>>> On 9/16/2026 9:45 PM, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>> @@ -163,18 +161,6 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>    	 */
>>>>    	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dp);
>>>>
>>>> -	/* This is for the backward compatibility. */
>>>> -	np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "panel", 0);
>>>> -	if (np) {
>>>> -		dp->plat_data.panel = of_drm_find_panel(np);
>>>> -
>>>> -		of_node_put(np);
>>>> -		if (IS_ERR(dp->plat_data.panel))
>>>> -			return PTR_ERR(dp->plat_data.panel);
>>>> -
>>>> -		goto out;
>>>> -	}
>>>> -
>>>
>>> TIP: In my WIP v3 patch series, I use of_drm_find_panel() together with
>>> devm_drm_panel_bridge_add() to maintain this backward compatibility. But
>>> I also think this old approach should be deprecated now. Shall we add
>>> some notes in the commit message to mention the deprecation of this method?
>>
>> What is the "WIP v3" series exactly? Do you have a link (to v2 in case v3
>> is not yet public)?
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20260804081717.741404-1-damon.ding@rock-chips.com/
> is the series in question.
> 
> 

Sorry for the confusion. I was discussing another separate series in 
this thread, which caused misunderstanding. I mentioned earlier that I 
will try to post its v3 update within this week.[0]

Best regards,
Damon

[0] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/57f57f40-87ec-47a2-a8b9-cc8b1adc3b8f@rock-chips.com/



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list