[PATCH] pmdomain: imx: gpc: remove all initialized power domains

Guangshuo Li lgs201920130244 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 22 00:41:07 PDT 2026


  Hi Andy,

 Thanks for the review.

On Fri, 18 Sept 2026 at 15:39, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 11:13:22AM +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> > imx_gpc_old_dt_init() initializes all power domains described by
> > of_id_data->num_domains. Its probe failure path removes all of these
> > domains, but imx_gpc_remove() only removes the PU and ARM domains.
> >
> > On SoCs with more than two domains, such as i.MX6SL and i.MX6SX, the
> > additional DISPLAY and PCI generic power domains can remain registered
> > after the GPC driver is removed.
> >
> > Remove all initialized power domains in reverse order. Keep releasing
> > the PU clocks immediately after the PU domain has been successfully
> > removed.
> >
> > This issue was found by manual code inspection.
>
> ...
>
> >  static void imx_gpc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> > +     const struct imx_gpc_dt_data *of_id_data =
> > +             device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>
> No...
>
> >       struct device_node *pgc_node;
> > -     int ret;
> > +     int i, ret;
>
> ...and no.
>
> The result of the device_get_match_data() better to be checked, in some cases
> it might lead to NULL dereference.
>
> It's better to split semantically different variables, also naming 'i' is not
> good, num_domains is better. Besides that, why is it signed?
>
> ...
>
> > +             for (i = of_id_data->num_domains - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
>
> What you are doing here can be written in a shorter form
>
>                 num_domains = of_id_data->num_domains;
>                 while (num_domains--) {
>
> > +                     ret = pm_genpd_remove(&imx_gpc_domains[i].base);
> > +                     if (ret) {
> > +                             dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > +                                     "Failed to remove %s power domain (%pe)\n",
> > +                                     imx_gpc_domains[i].base.name,
> > +                                     ERR_PTR(ret));
> > +                             return;
> > +                     }
> >
> > +                     if (i == GPC_PGC_DOMAIN_PU)
> > +                             imx_pgc_put_clocks(&imx_gpc_domains[i]);
> >               }
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
How about this:

 static void imx_gpc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
+       const struct imx_gpc_dt_data *of_id_data;
        struct device_node *pgc_node;
-       int ret;
+       unsigned int num_domains;
+       int ret;

        pgc_node = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, "pgc");

        ...

        if (!pgc_node) {
                of_genpd_del_provider(pdev->dev.of_node);

-               ret = pm_genpd_remove(&imx_gpc_domains[GPC_PGC_DOMAIN_PU].base);
-               if (ret) {
-                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to remove PU power
domain (%pe)\n",
-                               ERR_PTR(ret));
-                       return;
-               }
-               imx_pgc_put_clocks(&imx_gpc_domains[GPC_PGC_DOMAIN_PU]);
+               of_id_data = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+               if (!of_id_data)
+                       return;

-               ret =
pm_genpd_remove(&imx_gpc_domains[GPC_PGC_DOMAIN_ARM].base);
-               if (ret) {
-                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to remove ARM
power domain (%pe)\n",
-                               ERR_PTR(ret));
-                       return;
+               num_domains = of_id_data->num_domains;
+               while (num_domains--) {
+                       ret =
pm_genpd_remove(&imx_gpc_domains[num_domains].base);
+                       if (ret) {
+                               dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+                                       "Failed to remove %s power
domain (%pe)\n",
+                                       imx_gpc_domains[num_domains].base.name,
+                                       ERR_PTR(ret));
+                               return;
+                       }
+
+                       if (num_domains == GPC_PGC_DOMAIN_PU)
+
imx_pgc_put_clocks(&imx_gpc_domains[num_domains]);
                }
        }

Does this look OK to you? If so, I'll send a v2.

Thanks,
Guangshuo



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list