[PATCH v6 35/49] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Implement save/restore mechanisms for ISTs
Marc Zyngier
maz at kernel.org
Sat Sep 19 02:36:12 PDT 2026
On Fri, 04 Sep 2026 12:52:03 +0100,
Sascha Bischoff <Sascha.Bischoff at arm.com> wrote:
Another LKP bot sparse finding at 202609191215.to1MBYak-lkp at intel.com:
> +/*
> + * Save a linear host IST to userspace memory.
> + *
> + * Only the architected 32-bit ISTE state is stored. Metadata is skipped when
> + * striding through the host IST.
> + */
> +static int vgic_v5_save_linear_ist(const struct vgic_v5_ist_desc *ist,
> + u32 __user *uaddr, size_t nr_entries)
> +{
> + __le32 h_iste;
> + size_t index;
> + int ret;
> +
> + vgic_v5_clean_inval(ist->base,
> + GICV5_LINEAR_IST_SIZE(ist->id_bits, ist->istsz));
> +
> + for (index = 0; index < nr_entries; index++) {
> + __le32 *h_iste_addr = ist->base + index * ist->iste_size;
> +
> + h_iste = READ_ONCE(*h_iste_addr);
> + ret = put_user(h_iste, uaddr);
h_iste is an __le32, while uaddr is a pointer to u32. Not great, even
if arm64 BE is now dead. I'll queue this:
@@ -1459,7 +1459,6 @@ static int vgic_v5_get_lpi_ist_desc(struct kvm *kvm,
static int vgic_v5_save_linear_ist(const struct vgic_v5_ist_desc *ist,
u32 __user *uaddr, size_t nr_entries)
{
- __le32 h_iste;
size_t index;
int ret;
@@ -1468,8 +1467,9 @@ static int vgic_v5_save_linear_ist(const struct vgic_v5_ist_desc *ist,
for (index = 0; index < nr_entries; index++) {
__le32 *h_iste_addr = ist->base + index * ist->iste_size;
+ u32 h_iste;
- h_iste = READ_ONCE(*h_iste_addr);
+ h_iste = le32_to_cpu(READ_ONCE(*h_iste_addr));
ret = put_user(h_iste, uaddr);
if (ret)
return ret;
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz isn't dead. It just smells funny.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list