[PATCH v3 5/8] firmware: smccc: lfa: Add auto_activate sysfs file
Andre Przywara
andre.przywara at arm.com
Fri Sep 18 07:15:24 PDT 2026
Hi Nirmoy,
On 7/10/26 16:07, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2026 15:44:45 +0200, Andre Przywara wrote:
>
> Hi Andre,
>
>> The Arm LFA spec places control over the actual activation process in
>> the hands of the non-secure host OS. An platform initiated interrupt or
>> notification signals the availability of an updateable firmware image,
>> but does not necessarily need to trigger it automatically.
>>
>> Add a sysfs control file that guards such automatic activation. If an
>> administrator wants to allow automatic platform initiated updates, they
>> can activate that by echoing a "1" into the auto_activate file in the
>> respective sysfs directory. Any incoming notification would then result
>> in the activation triggered.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c b/drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c
>> index 5b7f9b07f6c8..ce4f966db475 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c
>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ enum image_attr_names {
>> LFA_ATTR_FORCE_CPU_RENDEZVOUS,
>> LFA_ATTR_ACTIVATE,
>> LFA_ATTR_CANCEL,
>> + LFA_ATTR_AUTO_ACTIVATE,
>> LFA_ATTR_NR_IMAGES
>> };
>>
>> @@ -103,6 +104,7 @@ struct fw_image {
>> bool may_reset_cpu;
>> bool cpu_rendezvous;
>> bool cpu_rendezvous_forced;
>> + bool auto_activate;
>> struct kobj_attribute image_attrs[LFA_ATTR_NR_IMAGES];
>> };
>>
>> @@ -550,6 +552,28 @@ static ssize_t cancel_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
>> return count;
>> }
>>
>> +static ssize_t auto_activate_store(struct kobject *kobj,
>> + struct kobj_attribute *attr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + struct fw_image *image = kobj_to_fw_image(kobj);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = kstrtobool(buf, &image->auto_activate);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t auto_activate_show(struct kobject *kobj,
>> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct fw_image *image = kobj_to_fw_image(kobj);
>> +
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", image->auto_activate);
>> +}
>> +
>> static struct kobj_attribute image_attrs_group[LFA_ATTR_NR_IMAGES] = {
>> [LFA_ATTR_NAME] = __ATTR_RO(name),
>> [LFA_ATTR_CURRENT_VERSION] = __ATTR_RO(current_version),
>> @@ -560,7 +584,8 @@ static struct kobj_attribute image_attrs_group[LFA_ATTR_NR_IMAGES] = {
>> [LFA_ATTR_CPU_RENDEZVOUS] = __ATTR_RO(cpu_rendezvous),
>> [LFA_ATTR_FORCE_CPU_RENDEZVOUS] = __ATTR_RW(force_cpu_rendezvous),
>> [LFA_ATTR_ACTIVATE] = __ATTR_WO(activate),
>> - [LFA_ATTR_CANCEL] = __ATTR_WO(cancel)
>> + [LFA_ATTR_CANCEL] = __ATTR_WO(cancel),
>> + [LFA_ATTR_AUTO_ACTIVATE] = __ATTR_RW(auto_activate),
>> };
>>
>> static void init_image_default_attrs(void)
>> @@ -631,6 +656,7 @@ static int update_fw_image_node(char *fw_uuid, int seq_id,
>> image->kobj.kset = lfa_kset;
>> image->image_name = image_name;
>> image->cpu_rendezvous_forced = true;
>> + image->auto_activate = false;
>
> Following up on our v2 discussion about the udev anchor after the
> SMCCC bus rework: I got a chance to try v3 on a real machine, and
> like the faux device in v2, the SMCCC bus device also works as the
> udev anchor:
>
> ACTION=="bind|change", SUBSYSTEM=="arm_smccc", KERNEL=="arm-smccc-lfa-*", \
> RUN+="/usr/local/sbin/lfa-auto-activate"
>
> Matching on "bind" instead of "add" worked better when I tried it,
> bind fires only after probe so /sys/firmware/lfa is already
> populated.
Ah, nice, thanks for staying on this!
> What is still missing is a notification when the image inventory
> changes at runtime. I tried the KOBJ_CHANGE approach from our v2
> discussion on top of v3, emitting from the SMCCC bus device after
> the image tree is refreshed, and it works: the same rule re-arms
> auto_activate when the event fires. What do you think about adding
> such a notification? I can send a patch on top once this series has
> landed,
I am not super excited about adding a global variable for the smccc bus
device just for this, but it's not a showstopper either. Maybe just
store the kobject we need?
In any case, can you please send a patch on top of v4 I just sent, maybe
as a --in-reply-to to the cover letter? This would honour your
contribution, and keep this patch close to the source and separate.
Cheers,
Andre
together with an example udev rule. This is what I tested:
>
> --- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@
> };
>
> static struct kset *lfa_kset;
> +static struct arm_smccc_device *lfa_sdev;
> static struct workqueue_struct *fw_images_update_wq;
> static struct work_struct fw_images_update_work;
> static struct attribute *image_default_attrs[LFA_ATTR_NR_IMAGES + 1];
> @@ -229,6 +230,19 @@
>
> delete_fw_image_node(image);
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * Notify user space only after the firmware image tree has been
> + * fully reconciled, so that consumers reading /sys/firmware/lfa/
> + * see a settled inventory.
> + */
> + if (lfa_sdev) {
> + int ret = kobject_uevent(&lfa_sdev->dev.kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + pr_warn("failed to send inventory change uevent: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + }
> }
>
> static void set_image_flags(struct fw_image *image, int seq_id,
> @@ -925,6 +939,8 @@
> }
> INIT_WORK(&fw_images_update_work, remove_invalid_fw_images);
>
> + lfa_sdev = sdev;
> +
> init_image_default_attrs();
> lfa_kset = kset_create_and_add("lfa", NULL, firmware_kobj);
> if (!lfa_kset) {
> @@ -966,6 +982,7 @@
> flush_workqueue(fw_images_update_wq);
> destroy_workqueue(fw_images_update_wq);
> clean_fw_images_tree();
> + lfa_sdev = NULL;
> kset_unregister(lfa_kset);
> }
>
>> set_image_flags(image, seq_id, image_flags, reg_current_ver,
>> reg_pending_ver);
>> if (kobject_init_and_add(&image->kobj, &image_ktype, NULL,
>> @@ -700,7 +726,8 @@ static int update_fw_images_tree(void)
>>
>> /*
>> * Go through all FW images in a loop and trigger activation
>> - * of all activatible and pending images.
>> + * of all activatible and pending images, but only if automatic
>> + * activation for that image is allowed.
>> * We have to restart enumeration after every triggered activation,
>> * since the firmware images might have changed during the activation.
>> */
>> @@ -719,7 +746,8 @@ static int activate_pending_image(void)
>> continue; /* Invalid FW component */
>>
>> update_fw_image_pending(image);
>> - if (image->activation_capable && image->activation_pending) {
>> + if (image->activation_capable && image->activation_pending &&
>> + image->auto_activate) {
>> found_pending = true;
>> break;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>
> Regards,
> Nirmoy
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list