[PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: xilinx: Document ifm ZynqMP VHIP6 EvalBoard
Michal Simek
michal.simek at amd.com
Fri Sep 11 01:38:08 PDT 2026
On 9/11/26 01:39, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 9/10/26 9:17 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/xilinx/xilinx.yaml
>>>>> @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ properties:
>>>>> - const: xlnx,zynq-zed
>>>>> - const: xlnx,zynq-7000
>>>>> + - items:
>>>>> + - const: ifm,zynqmp-vhip6-evalboard
>>>>> + - const: ifm,zynqmp-vhip6
>>>>> + - const: xlnx,zynqmp
>>>>> +
>>>>> - items:
>>>>> - enum:
>>>>> - xlnx,zynqmp-zc1751
>>>>
>>>> Can you please provide any link to public documentation about this board?
>>>> I wasn't able to find anything through google..
>>>
>>> I do not know whether there is any, it is an internal board from which other
>>> boards get derived.
>>>
>>> What would you like to know ?
>>
>> I would like to know value for me to maintain it. Why should I care about
>> board which don't have any public documentation and none can buy?
>
> I think because the users of this board actually do benefit from having the
> support upstream, instead of having to lug around random downstream patches in
> assorted state of decay.
>
>> There will be thousands of similar boards out there and I am definitely not
>> going to have all of them in the tree.
> Why not ? There are users who benefit from having their board support upstream.
> This is what other SoC vendors do as well, it does not seem to be a problem,
> rather it is a good indicator that the SoC has users who care about it and about
> upstream.
If there is public documentation about it I don't have any problem with it.
> If you do require a sample board, I could try to arrange that.
I definitely don't want that board.
Thanks,
Michal
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list