[PATCH v5 13/15] PCI/TSM: Move CMA DOE mailbox discovery out of pci_tsm_pf0_constructor()

[Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)]

pci_tsm_pf0_constructor() currently looks up a CMA DOE mailbox and
fails PF0 initialization when one is not present. That is too strict
for all link TSM drivers.

Move CMA DOE mailbox discovery into the low-level PF0 probe callbacks
so each driver can decide whether a mailbox is mandatory.

Keep SEV-TIO and TDX requiring a CMA mailbox, while allowing the
arm-cca host path to proceed on PF0 devices that do not support IDE
and therefore have no DOE-based SPDM path.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar at kernel.org>
---
 drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev-tsm.c      | 13 +++++++++++++
 drivers/pci/tsm.c                     | 13 +++++++------
 drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/main.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev-tsm.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev-tsm.c
index 46f2539d2d5a..e55eaca16998 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev-tsm.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev-tsm.c
@@ -217,6 +217,19 @@ static struct pci_tsm *tio_pf0_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct sev_device *se
 	if (rc)
 		return NULL;
 
+	/* if device have ide cap, setup doe mailbox */
+	if (pdev->ide_cap) {
+		struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb;
+
+		doe_mb = pci_find_doe_mailbox(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_PCI_SIG,
+					      PCI_DOE_FEATURE_CMA);
+		if (!doe_mb)
+			return NULL;
+		dsm->tsm.doe_mb = doe_mb;
+	} else {
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
 	pci_dbg(pdev, "TSM enabled\n");
 	dsm->sev = sev;
 	return &no_free_ptr(dsm)->tsm.base_tsm;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/tsm.c b/drivers/pci/tsm.c
index 5fdcd7f2e820..34805b7ba7a0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/tsm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/tsm.c
@@ -744,12 +744,13 @@ int pci_tsm_pf0_constructor(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct pci_tsm_pf0 *tsm,
 			    struct tsm_dev *tsm_dev)
 {
 	mutex_init(&tsm->lock);
-	tsm->doe_mb = pci_find_doe_mailbox(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_PCI_SIG,
-					   PCI_DOE_FEATURE_CMA);
-	if (!tsm->doe_mb) {
-		pci_warn(pdev, "TSM init failure, no CMA mailbox\n");
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
+	/*
+	 * Note, low-level TSM driver responsible for determining if it wants to
+	 * proceed with a device that has no DOE mailbox. TSM may have an
+	 * alternate method for coordinating TDISP.
+	 */
+	if (!tsm->doe_mb)
+		pci_dbg(pdev, "No CMA mailbox\n");
 
 	return pci_tsm_link_constructor(pdev, &tsm->base_tsm, tsm_dev);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/main.c b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/main.c
index b74fe1fb14fd..70cbff181561 100644
--- a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/main.c
+++ b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/main.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/tsm.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/cleanup.h>
+#include <linux/pci-doe.h>
 
 #include "rmi-da.h"
 
@@ -33,14 +34,22 @@ static struct pci_tsm *cca_tsm_pci_probe(struct tsm_dev *tsm_dev, struct pci_dev
 		return &no_free_ptr(fn_dsc)->pci;
 	}
 
-	if (!pdev->ide_cap)
-		return NULL;
-
 	struct cca_host_pf0_ep_dsc *pf0_ep_dsc __free(kfree) =
 		kzalloc(sizeof(*pf0_ep_dsc), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pf0_ep_dsc)
 		return NULL;
 
+	/* if device have ide cap, setup doe mailbox */
+	if (pdev->ide_cap) {
+		struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb;
+
+		doe_mb = pci_find_doe_mailbox(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_PCI_SIG,
+					      PCI_DOE_FEATURE_CMA);
+		if (!doe_mb)
+			return NULL;
+		pf0_ep_dsc->pci.doe_mb = doe_mb;
+	}
+
 	ret = pci_tsm_pf0_constructor(pdev, &pf0_ep_dsc->pci, tsm_dev);
 	if (ret)
 		return NULL;
-- 
2.43.0