[PATCH v17 01/20] KVM: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h

[Fuad Tabba]

On Tue, 8 Sept 2026 at 17:22, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com> wrote:
>
> Fix a potential build error (like below, when asm/kvm_emulate.h gets
> included after the kvm/arm_psci.h) by including the missing header file
> in kvm/arm_psci.h:
>
> ./include/kvm/arm_psci.h: In function ‘kvm_psci_version’:
> ./include/kvm/arm_psci.h:29:13: error: implicit declaration of function
>    ‘vcpu_has_feature’; did you mean ‘cpu_have_feature’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    29 |         if (vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2)) {
>                  |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>                                |             cpu_have_feature
>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan at redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba at linux.dev>

Cheers,
/fuad
> ---
>  include/kvm/arm_psci.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_psci.h b/include/kvm/arm_psci.h
> index f86a006d67136..06c20612e9e7d 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_psci.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_psci.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>  #include <uapi/linux/psci.h>
>
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> +
>  #define KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1       PSCI_VERSION(0, 1)
>  #define KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_2       PSCI_VERSION(0, 2)
>  #define KVM_ARM_PSCI_1_0       PSCI_VERSION(1, 0)
> --
> 2.43.0
>