[PATCH net-next 3/3] net: stmmac: Add UltraRISC DP1000 GMAC support

Jia Wang wangjia at ultrarisc.com
Thu Sep 3 23:01:05 PDT 2026


On 2026-09-03 14:30 +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/3/26 14:10, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>> This looks to be 90% identical to dwmac-sophgo.c.
> >>>
> >>> Do you expect any further changes to this driver? Is everything
> >>> supported? Are there more clocks? A GPIO for WoL?
> >>>
> >>> I'm just wondering if the common code should be pulled out, or even
> >>> dwmac-sophgo.c made generic so it can handle all plain boring devices
> >>> which have RGMII delays and not a lot else.
> >>>
> >>
> >> The probe boilerplate is indeed largely similar because both drivers
> >> use the common stmmac platform helpers. However, their platform-specific
> >> requirements differ: Sophgo requires additional TX clock handling and
> >> other configuration, while DP1000 requires fixed TX and RX delay
> >> handling. ACPI support under development is also intended to use the
> >> UltraRISC glue driver.
> > 
> > ACPI is going to be fun, since nobody does ACPI networking.
> > 
> > But how big is the change to the glue driver? I expect the change will
> > be minor, a call to devm_stmmac_probe_config_acpi(), in addition to
> > devm_stmmac_probe_config_dt(). Anything else?
> 
> I agree that if ACPI support is added, let's try to make it part of the
> core.
> 

The ACPI support is still under development, but the current prototype
adds ACPI device matching and ACPI-specific platform-data setup. Some
common stmmac changes are also needed for ACPI-described platform
resources and MDIO.

> > 
> > One problem the stmmac driver has is cut/paste glue driver
> > development. The same code is repeated again and again. Russell King
> > spent a lot of time and effort trying to reduce the duplication. So we
> > should not be adding more duplicated code unless it is actually
> > required.
> 
> It seems to me that all the RGMII handling could be made much more generic,
> as this is commong pattern in glue drivers :
> 
> dwmac-sophgo has the "has_internal_rx_delay" field, and dwmac-eic7700 has
> both has_internal_[r|t]x_delay.
> 
> With this third one, it makes sense to start sharing that logic across
> glues.
> 

I agree. DP1000 is another user of this pattern, with fixed internal
delays on both the TX and RX paths. I will look at moving this handling
into the common stmmac platform code, leaving each glue driver to
describe its internal delay capabilities.

Best regards,
Jia Wang




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list