[PATCH] dmaengine: stm32-mdma: Add missing check for device_property_read_u32_array
Amelie Delaunay
amelie.delaunay at foss.st.com
Wed Jan 28 02:23:57 PST 2026
On 1/28/26 05:23, Chen Ni wrote:
> Add check for the return value of device_property_read_u32_array() and
> return the error if it fails in order to catch the error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ni <nichen at iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/dma/stm32/stm32-mdma.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/stm32/stm32-mdma.c b/drivers/dma/stm32/stm32-mdma.c
> index b87d41b234df..f833724cf42c 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/stm32/stm32-mdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/stm32/stm32-mdma.c
> @@ -1630,9 +1630,11 @@ static int stm32_mdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> dmadev->nr_channels = nr_channels;
> dmadev->nr_requests = nr_requests;
> - device_property_read_u32_array(&pdev->dev, "st,ahb-addr-masks",
> - dmadev->ahb_addr_masks,
> - count);
> + ret = device_property_read_u32_array(&pdev->dev, "st,ahb-addr-masks",
> + dmadev->ahb_addr_masks,
> + count);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
Your patch breaks MDMA on STM32MP1x platforms because
"st,ahb-addr-masks" is an optional property. That is why the return
value of device_property_read_u32_array() is intentionally ignored.
Count is used to check the presence of the property and to allocate
dmadev->ahb_addr_masks accordingly:
count = device_property_count_u32(&pdev->dev, "st,ahb-addr-masks");
if (count < 0)
count = 0;
[...]
dmadev->nr_ahb_addr_masks = count;
If the property is not present, dmadev->nr_ahb_addr_masks is set to 0,
and MDMA behaves correctly.
With your patch, when the property is missing, the MDMA probe fails
because device_property_read_u32_array() returns -EINVAL. This is
incorrect since "st,ahb-addr-masks" is an optional property, not a
required one.
Regards,
Amelie
>
> dmadev->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(dmadev->base))
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list