[PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate vmid in arm_vsmmu_init
Nicolin Chen
nicolinc at nvidia.com
Mon Jan 26 19:06:24 PST 2026
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 05:16:36PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 05:24:24PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > VMID owned by a vSMMU should be allocated in the viommu_init callback, as
> > HW like tegra241-cmdqv needs to setup VINTF with the VMID.
>
> Even the architected SMMU needs this, the VMS (not implemented in
> Linux) should all share the same VMID for the same VM.
But for standard SMMU, the allocation/sharing could happen at the
device attachment to a nested (maybe bypass proxy) domain, right?
vmid is only needed for STE (attach) and invalidation.
Or do you see some other case where vmid must be allocated during
viommu_init?
> > +void arm_vsmmu_destroy(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_vsmmu *vsmmu = container_of(viommu, struct arm_vsmmu, core);
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&arm_smmu_asid_lock);
> > + ida_free(&vsmmu->smmu->vmid_map, vsmmu->vmid);
> > + mutex_unlock(&arm_smmu_asid_lock);
>
> Need a comment explaining where the flush is.
Ack.
> It looks like arm_smmu_iotlb_tag_free() does the free in the case of
> INV_TYPE_S2_VMID_VSMMU?
>
> But this patch doesn't have that code yet. So maybe this should be
> merged with the next patch..
Or maybe I should re-order the sequence of the patches. I'll see
what works the best.
Thanks
Nicolin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list