[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board

Daniel Baluta daniel.baluta at gmail.com
Wed Jan 21 00:32:33 PST 2026


On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 5:25 AM Sherry Sun <sherry.sun at nxp.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 06:26:03PM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote:
> > > Add DT compatible string for NXP i.MX93W EVK board.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun at nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > index 93ad6f0027d0..1769f243d70f 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > @@ -1432,6 +1432,7 @@ properties:
> > >                - fsl,imx93-11x11-evk       # i.MX93 11x11 EVK Board
> > >                - fsl,imx93-11x11-frdm      # i.MX93 11x11 FRDM Board
> > >                - fsl,imx93-14x14-evk       # i.MX93 14x14 EVK Board
> > > +              - fsl,imx93w-evk            # i.MX93W EVK Board
> >
> > Is 93w 11x11 or 14x14? can you add suffix to keep align existing one.
> >
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> IMX93W-EVK is the official board name, it basically reuse the  i.MX93 11x11
> EVK board, as described in the cover letter and dts patch. I prefer to still use
> this name (imx93w-evk) to keep align with the board official name.


No matter of what name we decide to use in the end please add this clarification
in the commit message.

Also please add small comment describing what are the major
differences between imx93w and
imx93 11x11 board.

thanks,
Daniel.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list