[PATCH v3 10/47] arm64: mpam: Initialise and context switch the MPAMSM_EL1 register
Ben Horgan
ben.horgan at arm.com
Mon Jan 19 07:31:34 PST 2026
Hi Gavin,
On 1/19/26 06:51, Gavin Shan wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On 1/13/26 12:58 AM, Ben Horgan wrote:
>> The MPAMSM_EL1 sets the MPAM labels, PMG and PARTID, for loads and stores
>> generated by a shared SMCU. Disable the traps so the kernel can use it
>> and
>> set it to the same configuration as the per-EL cpu MPAM configuration.
>>
>> If an SMCU is not shared with other cpus then it is implementation
>> defined whether the configuration from MPAMSM_EL1 is used or that from
>> the appropriate MPAMy_ELx. As we set the same, PMG_D and PARTID_D,
>> configuration for MPAM0_EL1, MPAM1_EL1 and MPAMSM_EL1 the resulting
>> configuration is the same regardless.
>>
>> The range of valid configurations for the PARTID and PMG in MPAMSM_EL1 is
>> not currently specified in Arm Architectural Reference Manual but the
>> architect has confirmed that it is intended to be the same as that for
>> the
>> cpu configuration in the MPAMy_ELx registers.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron at huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan at arm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v2:
>> Mention PMG_D and PARTID_D specifically int he commit message
>> Add paragraph in commit message on range of MPAMSM_EL1 fields
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h | 3 ++-
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/mpam.h | 2 ++
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 ++
>> arch/arm64/kernel/mpam.c | 3 +++
>> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>
> One nitpick below...
>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan at redhat.com>
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h b/arch/arm64/include/
>> asm/el2_setup.h
>> index cacd20df1786..d37984c09799 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
>> @@ -504,7 +504,8 @@
>> check_override id_aa64pfr0,
>> ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_MPAM_SHIFT, .Linit_mpam_\@, .Lskip_mpam_\@, x1, x2
>> .Linit_mpam_\@:
>> - msr_s SYS_MPAM2_EL2, xzr // use the default partition
>> + mov x0, #MPAM2_EL2_EnMPAMSM_MASK
>> + msr_s SYS_MPAM2_EL2, x0 // use the default partition,
>> // and disable lower traps
>> mrs_s x0, SYS_MPAMIDR_EL1
>> tbz x0, #MPAMIDR_EL1_HAS_HCR_SHIFT, .Lskip_mpam_\@ // skip
>> if no MPAMHCR reg
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mpam.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/
>> mpam.h
>> index 14011e5970ce..7b3d3abad162 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mpam.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mpam.h
>> @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ static inline void mpam_thread_switch(struct
>> task_struct *tsk)
>> return;
>> write_sysreg_s(regval, SYS_MPAM1_EL1);
>> + if (system_supports_sme())
>> + write_sysreg_s(regval & (MPAMSM_EL1_PARTID_D |
>> MPAMSM_EL1_PMG_D), SYS_MPAMSM_EL1);
>> isb();
>> /* Synchronising the EL0 write is left until the ERET to EL0 */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/
>> cpufeature.c
>> index 0cdfb3728f43..2ede543b3eeb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -2491,6 +2491,8 @@ cpu_enable_mpam(const struct
>> arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry)
>> regval = READ_ONCE(per_cpu(arm64_mpam_current, cpu));
>> write_sysreg_s(regval, SYS_MPAM1_EL1);
>> + if (system_supports_sme())
>> + write_sysreg_s(regval & (MPAMSM_EL1_PARTID_D |
>> MPAMSM_EL1_PMG_D), SYS_MPAMSM_EL1);
>> isb();
>> /* Synchronising the EL0 write is left until the ERET to EL0 */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mpam.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mpam.c
>> index dbe0a2d05abb..6ce4a36469ce 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/mpam.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mpam.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ static int mpam_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block
>> *self,
>> */
>> regval = READ_ONCE(per_cpu(arm64_mpam_current, cpu));
>> write_sysreg_s(regval, SYS_MPAM1_EL1);
>> + if (system_supports_sme())
>> + write_sysreg_s(regval & (MPAMSM_EL1_PARTID_D |
>> MPAMSM_EL1_PMG_D),
>> + SYS_MPAMSM_EL1);
>
> { } is missed here.
Addded.
>
>> isb();
>> write_sysreg_s(regval, SYS_MPAM0_EL1);
>
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>
Thanks,
Ben
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list