[PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: input: add GPIO charlieplex keypad
Geert Uytterhoeven
geert at linux-m68k.org
Thu Feb 26 01:32:30 PST 2026
Hi Hugo,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 at 16:54, Hugo Villeneuve <hugo at hugovil.com> wrote:
> From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve at dimonoff.com>
>
> Add DT bindings for GPIO charlieplex keypad.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve at dimonoff.com>
Thanks for your patch!
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-charlieplex-keypad.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/input/gpio-charlieplex-keypad.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: GPIO charlieplex keypad
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve at dimonoff.com>
> +
> +description: |
> + The charlieplex keypad supports N^2)-N different key combinations (where N is
> + the number of lines). Key presses and releases are detected by configuring
> + only one line as output at a time, and reading other line states. This process
> + is repeated for each line. Diodes are required to ensure current flows in only
> + one direction between any pair of pins.
> + This mechanism doesn't allow to detect simultaneous key presses.
Indeed, e.g. pressing S1 and S2 simultaneously will show a ghost
S5 keypress.
> +
> + Wiring example for 3 lines keyboard with 6 switches and 3 diodes:
> +
> + L0 --+---------------------+----------------------+
> + | | |
> + L1 -------+-----------+---------------------+ |
> + | | | | | |
> + L2 -------------+----------------+-----+ | |
> + | | | | | | | | |
> + | | | | | | | | |
> + | S1 \ S2 \ | S3 \ S4 \ | S5 \ S6 \
> + | | | | | | | | |
> + | +--+--+ | +--+--+ | +--+--+
> + | | | | | |
> + | D1 v | D2 v | D3 v
> + | - (k) | - (k) | - (k)
> + | | | | | |
> + +-------+ +-------+ +-------+
Don't you need pull-down resistors on L[0-2], and/or a way to specify
in DT to enable internal poll-down on GPIO controllers that support it?
Some controllers may support internal pull-up only, but I guess that
can be handled using GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW?
> +
> + L: GPIO line
> + S: switch
> + D: diode (k indicates cathode)
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: input.yaml#
> + - $ref: /schemas/input/matrix-keymap.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: gpio-charlieplex-keypad
> +
> + autorepeat: true
> +
> + debounce-delay-ms:
> + default: 5
> +
> + line-gpios:
> + description:
> + List of GPIOs used as lines. The gpio specifier for this property
> + depends on the gpio controller to which these lines are connected.
> +
> + linux,keymap: true
> +
> + poll-interval: true
> +
> + settling-time-us: true
> +
> + wakeup-source: true
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - line-gpios
> + - linux,keymap
> + - poll-interval
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
> +
> + charlieplex-keypad {
"keyboard", as per Devicetree Specification Generic Names
Recommendation.
> + compatible = "gpio-charlieplex-keypad";
> + debounce-delay-ms = <20>;
> + poll-interval = <5>;
> + settling-time-us = <2>;
> +
> + line-gpios = <&gpio2 25 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH
> + &gpio2 26 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH
> + &gpio2 27 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +
> + /* MATRIX_KEY(output, input, key-code) */
> + linux,keymap = <
> + /*
> + * According to wiring diagram above, if L1 is configured as
> + * output and HIGH, and we detect a HIGH level on input L0,
> + * then it means S1 is pressed: MATRIX_KEY(L1, L0, KEY...)
> + */
> + MATRIX_KEY(1, 0, KEY_F1) /* S1 */
> + MATRIX_KEY(2, 0, KEY_F2) /* S2 */
> + MATRIX_KEY(0, 1, KEY_F3) /* S3 */
> + MATRIX_KEY(2, 1, KEY_F4) /* S4 */
> + MATRIX_KEY(1, 2, KEY_F5) /* S5 */
> + MATRIX_KEY(0, 2, KEY_F6) /* S6 */
> + >;
> + };
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list