[PATCH v3 4/4] Input: charlieplex_keypad: add GPIO charlieplex keypad
Hugo Villeneuve
hugo at hugovil.com
Wed Feb 25 08:56:52 PST 2026
On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:41:55 -0500
Hugo Villeneuve <hugo at hugovil.com> wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> thank you for the review.
>
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 18:12:13 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 10:54:01AM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> >
> > > Add support for GPIO-based charlieplex keypad, allowing to control
> > > N^2-N keys using N GPIO lines.
> > >
> > > Reuse matrix keypad keymap to simplify, even if there is no concept
> > > of rows and columns in this type of keyboard.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +/*
> > > + * GPIO driven charlieplex keypad driver
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2025 Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve at dimonoff.com>
> > > + *
> > > + * Based on matrix_keyboard.c
> >
> > A single space after asterisk is enough.
>
> Ok, leftover from copy/paste from matrix_keyboard.c :)
>
> >
> > > + */
> >
> > ...
> >
> > + bitops.h
> >
> > > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> >
> > + dev_printk.h
> > + device/devres.h
> > + err.h
> >
> > > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > > +#include <linux/input.h>
> > > +#include <linux/input/matrix_keypad.h>
> >
> > + math.h
>
> Ok.
>
>
> >
> > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> >
> > > +#include <linux/of.h>
> >
> > Is this in use? Or you wanted mod_devicetable.h for OF ID table?
>
> I need only OF ID table, so will replace with mod_devicetable.h.
Hi Andy,
finally I need <linux/of.h> for of_match_ptr()...
But I will keep <mod_devicetable.h> ...
> >
> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > +#include <linux/property.h>
> > > +#include <linux/types.h>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > + for (code = 0, oline = 0; oline < keypad->nlines; oline++) {
> > > + DECLARE_BITMAP(values, MATRIX_MAX_ROWS);
> > > + int iline;
> >
> > > + int rc;
> >
> > I think Dmitry prefers 'error' name for this kind of variables.
>
> I hate using "error", can be so misleading :)
>
> I would prefer to use "rc" everywhere, but if Dmitry chimes in and
> specifies "error" or "err", then so it will be.
>
>
> >
> > > + /* Activate only one line as output at a time. */
> > > + gpiod_direction_output(keypad->line_gpios->desc[oline], 1);
> > > +
> > > + if (keypad->settling_time_us)
> > > + fsleep(keypad->settling_time_us);
> > > +
> > > + /* Read input on all other lines. */
> > > + rc = gpiod_get_array_value_cansleep(keypad->line_gpios->ndescs,
> > > + keypad->line_gpios->desc,
> > > + keypad->line_gpios->info, values);
> > > + if (rc)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + for (iline = 0; iline < keypad->nlines; iline++) {
> > > + if (iline == oline)
> > > + continue; /* Do not read active output line. */
> > > +
> > > + /* Check if GPIO is asserted. */
> > > + if (test_bit(iline, values)) {
> > > + code = MATRIX_SCAN_CODE(oline, iline,
> > > + get_count_order(keypad->nlines));
> > > + /*
> > > + * Exit loop immediately since we cannot detect
> > > + * more than one key press at a time.
> > > + */
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + gpiod_direction_input(keypad->line_gpios->desc[oline]);
> > > +
> > > + if (code)
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +static int charlieplex_keypad_init_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > > + struct charlieplex_keypad *keypad)
> > > +{
> > > + int i;
> >
> > Why signed? But see below as well.
>
> Will switch to unsigned.
>
>
> >
> > > + keypad->line_gpios = devm_gpiod_get_array(&pdev->dev, "line", GPIOD_IN);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(keypad->line_gpios))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(keypad->line_gpios);
> > > +
> > > + keypad->nlines = keypad->line_gpios->ndescs;
> > > +
> > > + if (keypad->nlines > MATRIX_MAX_ROWS)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > > + for (i = 0; i < keypad->nlines; i++)
> >
> > iterator is local to the loop, hence
> >
> > for (unsigned int i = 0; i < keypad->nlines; i++)
>
> Ok
>
>
> >
> > > + gpiod_set_consumer_name(keypad->line_gpios->desc[i], "charlieplex_kbd_line");
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +static int charlieplex_keypad_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct charlieplex_keypad *keypad;
> > > + unsigned int debounce_interval_ms;
> > > + unsigned int poll_interval_ms;
> > > + struct input_dev *input_dev;
> >
> > > + int err;
> >
> > The naming is even inconsistent between the functions...
>
> Agreed, will fix as stated above.
>
>
> >
> > > + keypad = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*keypad), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!keypad)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + input_dev = devm_input_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
> > > + if (!input_dev)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + keypad->input_dev = input_dev;
> > > +
> > > + device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "poll-interval", &poll_interval_ms);
> > > + device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "debounce-delay-ms", &debounce_interval_ms);
> > > + device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "settling-time-us", &keypad->settling_time_us);
> > > +
> > > + keypad->current_code = -1;
> > > + keypad->debounce_code = -1;
> > > + keypad->debounce_threshold = DIV_ROUND_UP(debounce_interval_ms, poll_interval_ms);
> > > +
> > > + err = charlieplex_keypad_init_gpio(pdev, keypad);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return err;
> > > +
> > > + input_dev->name = pdev->name;
> > > + input_dev->id.bustype = BUS_HOST;
> > > +
> > > + err = matrix_keypad_build_keymap(NULL, NULL, keypad->nlines,
> > > + keypad->nlines, NULL, input_dev);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENOMEM, "failed to build keymap\n");
> > > +
> > > + if (device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "autorepeat"))
> > > + __set_bit(EV_REP, input_dev->evbit);
> > > +
> > > + input_set_capability(input_dev, EV_MSC, MSC_SCAN);
> > > +
> > > + err = input_setup_polling(input_dev, charlieplex_keypad_poll);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, err, "unable to set up polling\n");
> > > +
> > > + input_set_poll_interval(input_dev, poll_interval_ms);
> > > +
> > > + input_set_drvdata(input_dev, keypad);
> > > +
> > > + err = input_register_device(keypad->input_dev);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return err;
> >
> > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, keypad);
> >
> > Is this needed?
>
> No, will remove it, and replace last lines with:
>
> return input_register_device(keypad->input_dev);
>
>
> >
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > --
> > With Best Regards,
> > Andy Shevchenko
> >
> >
> >
>
> Hugo Villeneuve
--
Hugo Villeneuve
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list