[PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: gpu: img: Add J721e SoC specific compatible
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Wed Feb 25 03:06:56 PST 2026
On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 12:09:16PM -0600, Antonios Christidis wrote:
> Add J721e SoC specific compatible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antonios Christidis <a-christidis at ti.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml
> index a1f54dbae3f3..56249d1e65aa 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml
> @@ -44,7 +44,11 @@ properties:
> - ti,j721s2-gpu
> - const: img,img-bxs-4-64
> - const: img,img-rogue
> -
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> + - ti,j721e-gpu
> + - const: img,img-ge8430
> + - const: img,img-rogue
> # This legacy combination of compatible strings was introduced early on
> # before the more specific GPU identifiers were used.
> - items:
> @@ -103,6 +107,7 @@ allOf:
> - ti,am62-gpu
> - ti,am62p-gpu
> - ti,j721s2-gpu
> + - ti,j721e-gpu
What about img,img-ge8430? Why this one does not have constraints?
What about all other constraints?
> then:
> properties:
> clocks:
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list