[PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: gpu: img: Add J721e SoC specific compatible

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzk at kernel.org
Wed Feb 25 03:06:56 PST 2026


On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 12:09:16PM -0600, Antonios Christidis wrote:
> Add J721e SoC specific compatible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Antonios Christidis <a-christidis at ti.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml
> index a1f54dbae3f3..56249d1e65aa 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml
> @@ -44,7 +44,11 @@ properties:
>                - ti,j721s2-gpu
>            - const: img,img-bxs-4-64
>            - const: img,img-rogue
> -
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - ti,j721e-gpu
> +          - const: img,img-ge8430
> +          - const: img,img-rogue
>        # This legacy combination of compatible strings was introduced early on
>        # before the more specific GPU identifiers were used.
>        - items:
> @@ -103,6 +107,7 @@ allOf:
>                - ti,am62-gpu
>                - ti,am62p-gpu
>                - ti,j721s2-gpu
> +              - ti,j721e-gpu

What about img,img-ge8430? Why this one does not have constraints?

What about all other constraints?

>      then:
>        properties:
>          clocks:

Best regards,
Krzysztof




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list