[PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: mmc: fsl-imx-esdhc: add S32N79 support

[Conor Dooley]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 05:58:05PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 12:15:31PM +0100, Ciprian Costea wrote:
> > From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea at oss.nxp.com>
> > 
> > Add compatible string "nxp,s32n79-usdhc" for the uSDHC controller found in
> > NXP S32N79 series automotive SoCs.
> > 
> > The controller is compatible with the existing i.MX uSDHC controllers.
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore at nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore at nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea at oss.nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > index b98a84f93277..014b049baeb6 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ properties:
> >            - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
> >            - fsl,imxrt1050-usdhc
> >            - nxp,s32g2-usdhc
> > +          - nxp,s32n79-usdhc
> 
> Ditto here, no driver change?

Actually, this doesn't make sense per the commit message "the
controller is compatible with the existing...". I'd expect to see a
fallback compatible permitted in that case.

> 
> >        - items:
> >            - const: fsl,imx50-esdhc
> >            - const: fsl,imx53-esdhc
> > -- 
> > 2.43.0
> > 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20260224/a6319912/attachment.sig>