[GIT PULL v3] arm/arm64: dts: socfpga: updates for v6.20, version 3

[Dinh Nguyen]

On 2/13/26 10:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/02/2026 04:32, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> SoCFPGA DTS updates for v6.20, version 3
>> - dt-bindings updates:
>> 	- Add intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk-modular for the Agilex5 mod board
>> 	- Add intel,socfpga-agilex-emmc for the Agilex eMMC daughter board
>> 	- Move entries in intel,socfpga.yaml into altera.yaml
>> 	- Add syscon as a fallback for sys-mgr
>>
>> - Add dma-cohrerent property for Agilex5 NAND and DMA
>> - Add support for the Agilex5 modular board
>> - Add IOMMUS property for ethernet nodes for Agilex5
>> - Use lowercase hex for dts files
>> - Add #address-cells and #size-cells for sram
>> - Fix dtbs_check warning for fpga-region
>> - Move dma controller node for Agilex5 under simple-bus
>> - Add support for the Agilex eMMC daughter board
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Dinh Nguyen (4):
>>        dt-bindings: arm: altera: combine Intel's SoCFPGA into altera.yaml
>>        dt-bindings: altera: document syscon as fallback for sys-mgr
>>        ARM: dts: socfpga: add #address-cells and #size-cells for sram node
>>        ARM: dts: socfpga: fix dtbs_check warning for fpga-region
>>
>> Khairul Anuar Romli (2):
>>        arm64: dts: socfpga: agilex5: Add dma-coherent property
>>        arm64: dts: intel: agilex5: Add simple-bus node on top of dma controller node
>>
>> Krzysztof Kozlowski (1):
>>        arm64: dts: altera: Use lowercase hex
>>
>> Nazim Amirul (1):
>>        arm64: dts: socfpga: agilex5: Add IOMMUS property for ethernet nodes
>>
>> Ng Tze Yee (2):
>>        arm64: dts: socfpga: agilex: add emmc support
>>        dt-bindings: intel: Add Agilex eMMC support
>>
>> Niravkumar L Rabara (2):
>>        dt-bindings: intel: Add Agilex5 SoCFPGA modular board
>>        arm64: dts: socfpga: agilex5: add support for modular board
>>
> 
> I checked few of here and none of them were in the next at the time you
> sent pull request, even though some were sent and applied long time ago.
> 
> Like this one - applied on 24th Dec:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/4bd0643c-b9d4-49fa-92a5-f8878f75d1e1@kernel.org/
> 
> but never in the next.
> 
> In case if something is not clear: there must be in the linux-next at
> shortest interval after you apply the patches, so the NEXT linux-next
> after you apply.
> 

Sorry, I will make sure my branch gets pulled into linux-next in the future.

THanks,
Dinh