[PATCH v6 00/19] ARM64 PMU Partitioning
Colton Lewis
coltonlewis at google.com
Thu Feb 12 13:08:36 PST 2026
Hey Marc, thanks for the review.
Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org> writes:
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2026 22:13:55 +0000,
> Colton Lewis <coltonlewis at google.com> wrote:
>> This series creates a new PMU scheme on ARM, a partitioned PMU that
>> allows reserving a subset of counters for more direct guest access,
>> significantly reducing overhead. More details, including performance
>> benchmarks, can be read in the v1 cover letter linked below.
>> An overview of what this series accomplishes was presented at KVM
>> Forum 2025. Slides [1] and video [2] are linked below.
>> IMPORTANT: This iteration does not yet implement the dynamic counter
>> reservation approach suggested by Will Deacon in January [3]. I am
>> working on it, but wanted to send this version first to keep momentum
>> going and ensure I've addressed all issues besides that.
> [...]
> As I have asked before, this is missing an example of how userspace is
> going to use this. Without it, it is impossible to correctly review
> this series.
> Please consider this as a blocker.
Understood. I remember you asking for a QEMU patch specifically.
I had hoped that the use in the selftest was sufficient to show how to
use the uAPI. If not, I can send out an example QEMU patch to the QEMU
ARM mailing list.
> Thanks,
> M.
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list