[PATCH v1 1/3] KVM: arm64: Hide S1POE from guests when not supported by the host
Marc Zyngier
maz at kernel.org
Thu Feb 12 01:29:37 PST 2026
Hi Fuad,
On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:02:50 +0000,
Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com> wrote:
>
> When CONFIG_ARM64_POE is disabled, KVM does not save/restore POR_EL1.
> However, ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1 sanitisation currently exposes the feature to
> guests whenever the hardware supports it, ignoring the host kernel
> configuration.
This is the umpteenth time we get caught by this. PAN was the latest
instance until this one. Maybe an approach would be to have a default
override when a config option is not enabled, so that KVM is
consistent with the rest of the kernel?
>
> If a guest detects this feature and attempts to use it, the host will
> fail to context-switch POR_EL1, potentially leading to state corruption.
>
> Fix this by masking ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1.S1POE and preventing KVM from
> advertising the feature when the host does not support it, i.e.,
> system_supports_poe() is false.
>
> Fixes: 70ed7238297f ("KVM: arm64: Sanitise ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1")
> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index ac7f970c7883..7af72ca749a6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1592,7 +1592,8 @@ void kvm_set_vm_id_reg(struct kvm *kvm, u32 reg, u64 val);
> (kvm_has_feat((k), ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1, S1PIE, IMP))
>
> #define kvm_has_s1poe(k) \
> - (kvm_has_feat((k), ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1, S1POE, IMP))
> + (system_supports_poe() && \
> + kvm_has_feat((k), ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1, S1POE, IMP))
Why do we need to further key this on system_supports_poe()? I can see
this is a potential optimisation, but I don't think this is part of
the minimal fix.
>
> #define kvm_has_ras(k) \
> (kvm_has_feat((k), ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, RAS, IMP))
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 88a57ca36d96..237e8bd1cf29 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -1816,6 +1816,9 @@ static u64 __kvm_read_sanitised_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1_SCTLRX |
> ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1_S1POE |
> ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1_S1PIE;
> +
> + if (!system_supports_poe())
> + val &= ~ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1_S1POE;
How about S1PIE? It seems to have a similar problem, in the sense that
it has extra state. But I guess because we don't put it behind a
config option, we context-switch it anyway and all is good?
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list