[RFC PATCH 0/4] hwspinlock: refactor headers into public provider/consumer pair
Wolfram Sang
wsa+renesas at sang-engineering.com
Tue Feb 10 02:44:25 PST 2026
Hi Andy,
> > And if so, would be this series acceptable
> > as-is then (modulo the better include-sorting mentioned by Andy)?
>
> *From my experience it's not the Q "will they or not?", the Q is "when?"
> they start abusing it. I really prefer to hide as much as possible from
I totally agree with you on that.
> day 1. Maybe the structure can be split to two? Currently IIO has a
I also thought that keeping some internal header might provide that
safety. When looking into it, I didn't see an obvious and somewhat
elegant way. Even more, I got a better picture of why Bjorn named the
current approach "unergonomic". I got some ideas which look doable in my
time frame. I will try going the full route, after all.
I'll start with some cleanup in some minutes.
Happy hacking,
Wolfram
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list