[PATCH 2/4] irqchip/ast2700-intcx: Add AST2700 INTC0/INTC1 support

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Sat, Feb 07 2026 at 03:50, Ryan Chen wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
>> Sent: Friday, February 6, 2026 7:34 PM
>> To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen at aspeedtech.com>; Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>;
>> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt at kernel.org>; Conor Dooley
>> <conor+dt at kernel.org>; Joel Stanley <joel at jms.id.au>; Andrew Jeffery
>> <andrew at codeconstruct.com.au>; Paul Walmsley <pjw at kernel.org>; Palmer
>> Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>; Albert Ou <aou at eecs.berkeley.edu>;
>> Alexandre Ghiti <alex at ghiti.fr>
>> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org;
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-aspeed at lists.ozlabs.org;
>> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org; Ryan Chen <ryan_chen at aspeedtech.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] irqchip/ast2700-intcx: Add AST2700 INTC0/INTC1
>> support

Please fix your email client to not copy all mail headers. If you can't
fix it, remove them manually and replace it with the usual:

On Fri, Feb 06 2026 at ...., Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > +	guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&intc0->intc_lock);
>> 
>> s/_irqsave// Interrupts are disabled when this is invoked.
> Sorry, do you mean when this function been call.
> Ther have desc->lock to do the raw_spin_lock_irqsave.

The core always holds irq_desc::lock with interrupts disabled when it
invokes those irqchip callbacks. So trying to disable interrupts in them
again is a pointless exercise.