[PATCH v6 0/3] s32g: Use a syscon for GPR
Dan Carpenter
dan.carpenter at linaro.org
Wed Feb 4 04:08:17 PST 2026
On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 02:54:38PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 12:18:54 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > It looks like patch 3/3 depends on 1/3 but it should land in a different
> > tree, as patches 1 && 2 looks suitable for 'net-next' and 3/3 should
> > probably go via the arm/freescale tree.
> >
> > We either need explicit ack from freescale maintainers or this should be
> > split across subtrees, right?
>
> FWIW normally we don't touch the dts patch at all, unless the
> maintainer chimes in and tells us to take it. No waiting for acks.
> Off the top of my head us taking dts patches only happens if
> the person posting the patch _is_ the platform maintainer..
>
> For this series we're waiting for the bindings to be reviewed.
Ugh. Crap. Rob already reviewed them. I included his Reviewed-by tag
in v5 but I accidentally removed it that from v6. I'm so sorry.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/939fdaf94038613486bdbba510a92a1e57e18c71.1769592679.git.dan.carpenter@linaro.org/
regards,
dan carpenter
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list