[PATCH 1/3] dt-binding: document QCOM platforms for CTCU device

[Jie Gan]

On 2/3/2026 5:31 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 03/02/2026 09:00, Jie Gan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/3/2026 4:50 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 2/3/26 9:08 AM, Jie Gan wrote:
>>>> Document the platforms that fallback to using the qcom,sa8775p-ctcu
>>>> compatible for probing.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jie Gan <jie.gan at oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml | 4 
>>>> ++++
>>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight- 
>>>> ctcu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight- 
>>>> ctcu.yaml
>>>> index e002f87361ad..68853db52bef 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml
>>>> @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ properties:
>>>>       oneOf:
>>>>         - items:
>>>>             - enum:
>>>> +              - qcom,glymur-ctcu
>>>> +              - qcom,hamoa-ctcu
>>>> +              - qcom,kaanapali-ctcu
>>>> +              - qcom,pakala-ctcu
>>>
>>> Platforms with existing numeric compatibles should continue to use them,
>>> so that the mess is somewhat containable
>>
>> Sure Konrad. So for Pakala, I will change it back to qcom,sm8750-ctcu
> 
> Why do we need different compatibles for the others ? Are they not all 
> compliant to the CTCU programming model ? i.e., sa8775p-ctcu ? or even,
> a generic,
> 
> qcom,coresight-ctcu

Hi Suzuki,

The platforms here have two ETR devices, using same "data" in driver. We 
also have platforms only contain one ETR device and we need create a new 
data for these platforms.

I have proposed previously to have generic compatible for CTCU device 
but I got comment for preferring use platform-specific compatible.

Is that acceptable to use qcom,coresight-ctcu-v1 for TWO ETR devices 
platform and qcom,coresight-ctcu-v2 for ONE ETR device platform?

I think it's better to avoid annoying dt-binding patches for the CTCU 
device.

Thanks,
Jie

> 
> Suzuki
> 
> 
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jie
>>
>>>
>>> Konrad
>>
>